Too Dumb to Retire
An Old Fart Rants and Raves

Who represents truckers?


[Comments] [Send Article] [Improper]

I’ve heard there are 1.3 million big rigs running around the US. I can’t verify that number but let’s go with it. Of that number how many have any voice about HOS rules, DOT concerns, rogue cops, unreasonable company demands and on and on? You know the answer. We’re the ones keeping the goods and materials moving and we have no say in the matter at all. The HOS rules are a joke. You’re paid by the mile. If you start your day at 7am, drive 4 hours for a pick up and have to wait 8 hours to get loaded or unloaded, how many more hours can you drive that day? 2 more hours and you’ve got to take 10 off. That’s 6 hours driving for the day at say 37 cents per mile. If you’re lucky you might do 375 real miles. $138 for the day, do that for 6 days before you have to recycle and take out all of the taxes and other deductions, and then figure your meals and what do you have left? About $325.00 take home pay.

Is it any wonder that more drivers are going to loose leaf log books? (In case we make a mistake and need to correct it of course). In reality, drivers are showing 10-11 hours per day driving on the log book, but spending more hours per day, to get the miles they need in order to make a decent pay check. And there are those “do-gooders” out there who want trucks off the road altogether, who don’t know the first thing about the industry who are getting the ear of the Feds. Like liberal advocacy groups around the country, they have all the answers but never ask any of the questions.

So who represents the truckers? Trucking Companies have their lobbyists and certainly make contributions to their favorite elected officials. OOIDA tries very hard to be heard.
Unions do their part, but what about the rest of us? The truth is, we’ll never have a voice.
Sure we gripe and complain about the way things are, but that’s about it. If things keep going the way they are, then we can forget about log books, it will all be done electronically, will that be better for us? No, it will result in more trucks needed, more drivers needed, more traffic on the highway and higher wages needed to compensate, higher cost for transportation. Who wins? No one. But there is a possible solution.

We all need to unionize. OK, I hear it now, but stop and think a moment. If the Teamsters would get off their duff and do something in the trucking industry like they used to instead of looking to unionize hotel workers, then there would be a solid voice in the trucking industry. I’m not saying we’d all be making 50 cents a mile, we wouldn’t. Each company negotiates a contract with their drives, but if this were to occur then there would be a solid voice that would have some clout and we would be heard.

I’d love to hear feedback on this one.

Enjoy the day

Geezer

Category Posted: General


Comments



I for one am against the unions. My dad and many of his brothers were in one type of a union or another. They even agree that Unions are a thing of the past. They don't have near the clout they had years ago and I have to agree with them. We need more groups like OOIDA and for people to join and be active in every possible way, not just join and then sit back and expect others to do the leg work. My dad is a retired ironworker and was in the union for 40+ yrs so I have seen the good that unions had done but they became money hungry. My wife and I are company drivers and belong to OOIDA and spend alot of time writing letters and calling the different government officials, not belly aching on the cb about how bad things are. A persons voice can only be heard if it is done on the phone, on paper or by e-mail and preferably by all three.

Comment By:
Bob on Wed, May 31 2006 @ 10:46 PM [EST]
I too share your observation about unions, plus when they get too powerful, they tend to become political. But there needs to be a powerful voice. If OOIDA can do it, then great. If they can put on a full blown membership campaign that will attract company drivers, like yourselves, then I'm all for it. OOIDA are you listening?

Comment By:
Geezer on Thu, Jun 01 2006 @ 7:34 AM [EST]
The company I work for has union and non-union divisions and I like to work for the non-union division because they treat us better to spite the union. They pay us a dollar and change more an hour and I don't have to pay dues. They also have retirement plans, CHRISTmas bonuses, and other perks the union drivers don't get. The union drivers in their break room constantly state how much seniority they have and are a bunch of lazy bastards. I work my ass off and my company treats me with respect and gives me plenty of hours because I EARN it. Seniority means shit to me. However, I do like that we have a union because it makes our company pay us non-union drivers more out of spite. There has to be a happy medium somewhere though. You guys that bust your ass driving OTR have my respect because I've been in your shoes. The union=lazy to me. Vm-out

Comment By:
vaqueromuerto on Thu, Jun 01 2006 @ 8:25 AM [EST]
I think teamster is the way to go , hands down. The drivers who say that teamsters mean nothing to them are the one's who think they should start at the top, and the hell with everybody else. Those are the one's who will never fight for change. They pride themselves on bitching and moaning, but never accomplish anything.Lets start a movement and follow through with it. It's time folks.

Comment By:
dwayne colby on Sun, Sep 16 2007 @ 9:58 AM [EST]

* All Fields Are Required
Name:
Email: (Not Displayed)
Comments:

(chars left)
<< Enter this code in the box to the left.
Remember Me


Send This Article



* All Fields Are Required
Your Name:
Your Email:
Friend's Email:
<< Enter this code in the box to the left.
Remember Me


Improper Post



I found this article to be improper because:
Reason:
<< Enter this code in the box to the left.